🔗 Share this article

Turns out he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.