🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.