'We called ourselves the lifeboat crew': How laid-off aid employees initiated a rescue initiative 'aiming to rescue as many infants as we can'.
They describe themselves as the "emergency rescue team". Following being let go when overseas aid faced cuts in the past months, a collective of committed workers chose to launch their own rescue package.
Choosing not to "remain in despair", a former economist, along with like-minded past team members, began endeavors to rescue some of the essential initiatives that were at risk after the funding decreases.
Currently, close to 80 projects have been saved by a connector platform run by Rosenbaum and other former aid staff, which has secured them in excess of $110 million in recent backing. The group behind the resource optimization project effort projects it will benefit forty million people, including many children under five.
Following the termination of operations, spending was frozen, thousands of employees were laid off, and projects worldwide either ended suddenly or were left limping toward what Rosenbaum terms "drop-dead dates".
He and some of his colleagues were approached by a foundation that "aimed to determine how they could maximize the impact of their finite budgets".
They created a menu from the cancelled projects, pinpointing those "delivering the most vital support per dollar" and where a alternative supporter could practically step in and maintain operations.
They quickly understood the need was wider than that first foundation and began to reach out to additional possible supporters.
"We referred to ourselves as the emergency squad at the beginning," states Rosenbaum. "The ship has been collapsing, and there aren't enough rescue vessels for each programme to get on, and so we're trying to literally rescue as many babies as we can, secure spots for these lifeboats as possible, via the projects that are delivering aid."
Pro, now working as part of a international policy center, has obtained financial support for 79 projects on its selection in in excess of 30 countries. Several have had initial backing reinstated. A number were not able to be saved in time.
Backing has originated from a mix of philanthropic foundations and private benefactors. Most prefer to stay anonymous.
"The supporters originate from diverse motivations and viewpoints, but the common thread that we've received from them is, 'I feel appalled by what's going on. I really want to figure out a way to intervene,'" explains the leader.
"I think that there was an 'lightbulb moment' for everyone involved as we commenced efforts on this, that this created an possibility to shift from the passive sadness, remaining in the gloom of everything that was occurring around us, to having something productive to deeply commit to."
An example programme that has found funding through the effort is operations by the the medical alliance to offer support encompassing treatment for severe acute malnutrition, prenatal and postnatal support and vital childhood vaccines in the country.
It is essential to maintain these operations, explains the leader, not only because restarting operations if they stopped would be extremely costly but also because of how much confidence would be forfeited in the war-torn regions if the alliance left.
"They informed us […] 'we're very worried that if we walk away, we may never be invited back.'"
Initiatives with longer-term goals, such as strengthening health systems, or in additional areas such as schooling, have remained outside Pro's work. It also does not seek to preserve programmes forever but to "create a window for the organizations and, truthfully, the broader ecosystem, to figure out a permanent resolution".
Having found support for each programme on its first selection, the team announces it will now concentrate on assisting more people with "proven, cost-effective interventions".